Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens bulk RNA-seq using Helicos HeliScope single-molecule sequencing yields 433M reads without PCR amplification (43.4% GC content), capturing full-length cDNA profiles without amplification bias or chimera artifacts. Distinctive single-molecule approach avoids amplicon-length bias; limited sequence-index availability and obsolete platform make reanalysis challenging.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0