SRP006794

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

42/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Ovis aries (sheep) WGS on 454 GS 20 with 270k reads at lower quality (86.9% ≥Q20, 22.5% ≥Q30). Small legacy platform dataset; suitable only for targeted genomic region validation in ovine genetics.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Ovis aries

Instrument

454 GS 20

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 29273396 reported

total reads 270661 reported

n content pct 0.253 measured

pct q20 bases 86.9 measured

pct q30 bases 22.5 measured

gc content pct 38.6 measured

mean read length 108.2 measured

mean base quality 25.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 14.01 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 42/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 22.5 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 14.01 measured ×0.5 81%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0