Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Large-scale human bulk RNA-seq from Illumina Genome Analyzer II spans 17.5B reads across multiple lanes with moderate base quality (86.3% ≥Q20, 71.4% ≥Q30), enabling isoform and fusion-gene discovery at scale. Quality variation across lanes may require per-lane filtering and normalization; search terms: human transcriptome, GA-II RNA-seq expression profiling.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0