Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila bipectinata WGS via 454 GS FLX Titanium produces 62M high-quality reads (91% ≥Q20, 77% ≥Q30), enabling comparative genomics of this species complex. Moderate depth suits variant surveys and population genetic studies in non-model Drosophila; cross-reference with D. melanogaster for synteny and ortholog mapping.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0