SRP008024

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

54/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila takahashii WGS from a 454 GS FLX Titanium platform with 64 million long reads at 74% Q30. The longer reads assist in resolving Drosophila-specific repetitive regions and structural variants.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila takahashii

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

27 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 21046625999 reported

total reads 64361990 reported

n content pct 0.012 measured

pct q20 bases 89.3 measured

pct q30 bases 73.5 measured

gc content pct 39.8 measured

mean read length 362.2 measured

mean base quality 33.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 10.82 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 54/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 73.5 measured ×1 18%

duplication rate pct 10.82 measured ×0.5 91%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0