SRP008029

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

30/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila eugracilis whole-genome sequencing via 454 GS FLX Titanium generating 17.2 billion bases (87.7% Q20), supporting Drosophila comparative genomics.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila eugracilis

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

29 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 17207181239 reported

total reads 56215715 reported

n content pct 0.021 measured

pct q20 bases 87.7 measured

pct q30 bases 69.2 measured

gc content pct 40.4 measured

mean read length 335.2 measured

mean base quality 32.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 28.72 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 30/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 69.2 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 28.72 measured ×0.5 35%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 5 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0