Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
34/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This hybrid short- and long-read WGS dataset of the pathogenic Escherichia coli O104:H4 strain was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000, with notably low short-read quality (17.2% Q20), reflecting the challenges of sequencing this clinically relevant O-antigen serotype. The combination of read types and 51.2% GC content enables investigation of genomic assembly, structural variants, and virulence determinants associated with outbreak strains. Users should apply stringent quality filtering and assembly algorithms designed for hybrid data when analyzing this pathogen genome.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0