← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Bacteria
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
7 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
3499443293
reported
total reads
6813817
reported
n content pct
0.15
measured
pct q20 bases
76.7
measured
pct q30 bases
59.6
measured
gc content pct
55.8
measured
mean read length
526
measured
mean base quality
29.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
81.62
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
59.6
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
28 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0