SRP010986

ENA first seen 2012

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

17/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Homo sapiens WGS on AB SOLiD 4 System with 99M reads (1.7× extrapolated depth) at lower quality (66.5% ≥Q20, 27.1% ≥Q30). Shallow-coverage legacy platform dataset; suitable only for major variant detection after stringent filtering.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

AB SOLiD 4 System

Platform

ABI_SOLID

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

28 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5359779935 reported

total reads 99098250 reported

mean coverage 1.7 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 66.5 measured

pct q30 bases 27.1 measured

gc content pct 0 measured

mean read length 51 measured

mean base quality 21.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 32.28 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 17/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 1.7 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 27.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 32.28 measured ×0.5 24%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0