SRP012062

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human RNA-seq from an Illumina Genome Analyzer with high Q30 (100%) but extremely high N-content (16.6%), indicating severe sequencing issues or contamination. The dataset should be used with caution, with extensive quality filtering required for downstream analysis.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

4 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3059216640 reported

total reads 84978240 reported

n content pct 16.555 measured

pct q20 bases 100 measured

pct q30 bases 100 measured

gc content pct 42 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 30 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.58 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 30 measured ×0.6 33%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 0.58 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0