Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP013742

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

32/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (Locusta migratoria) with failed F-grade score (32/100). Catastrophic base quality (Q30 60.9%, mean 25.7, both scoring 0/100) indicates severe sequencing failure or platform artifacts from legacy HiSeq 2000. Not suitable for reuse; resequencing is mandatory.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Locusta migratoria
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
4 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 31377996432 reported
total reads 155336616 reported
n content pct 0.001 measured
pct q20 bases 71.1 measured
pct q30 bases 60.9 measured
gc content pct 51.3 measured
mean read length 101 measured
mean base quality 25.7 measured
adapter content pct 0.23 measured
duplication rate pct 34.47 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 32/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 60.9 measured ×1 0%
mean base quality 25.7 measured ×0.6 0%
adapter content pct 0.23 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 34.47 measured ×0.4 90%
QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 60