Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Peromyscus leucopus bulk RNA-seq via 454 GS FLX+ yields 1B reads with unexpectedly poor quality (29.2% ≥Q20, 18.8% ≥Q30) and anomalous 0% GC content, indicating possible sequencing or data quality issues. Proceed with caution; validate base composition, run-level metrics, and implement stringent filtering before expression quantification or isoform analysis.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0