SRP020353

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

mouse gut metagenome

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

80 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 55757312 reported

total reads 291357 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 97.8 measured

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured

gc content pct 54.6 measured

mean read length 194.9 measured

mean base quality 37.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 93.43 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured ×1 99%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0