Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human gut metagenome WGS via HiSeq 2000 yields 476M reads with moderate quality (86.1% ≥Q20, 80.3% ≥Q30), enabling microbial community composition and functional-gene discovery. Good read coverage and moderate quality support ecological profiling and functional inference; microbiome-specific databases and taxonomic frameworks available for annotation.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0