Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This large-scale human amplicon dataset on an Illumina MiSeq generated 128 million short reads with consistent 91.9% Q30 quality, indicating a well-executed multiplexed amplicon experiment. Researchers investigating human population-level microbiota or genomic variants will find sufficient read depth and uniform quality for allele-frequency estimation and community profiling across many samples. The dataset supports stringent variant filtering and reliable OTU/ASV clustering for microbiome analysis.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0