SRP025982

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

ABI_SOLID

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2,898 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3797698977621 reported

total reads 21360099348 reported

n content pct 0.317 measured

pct q20 bases 94.9 measured

pct q30 bases 91 measured

gc content pct 50.5 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 35.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.06 measured

duplication rate pct 12.12 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35.4 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.06 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 12.12 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0