Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP028180

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

42/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Early-generation RNA-seq from Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx producing 36 bp reads—historically common but now dated for comprehensive transcriptomics. Supports basic gene expression quantification but lower base quality (84.8% Q20) and shorter reads than modern protocols require aggressive filtering and limit isoform resolution.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
24 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 81648955245 reported
total reads 1707723240 reported
n content pct 0.004 measured
pct q20 bases 84.8 measured
pct q30 bases 73 measured
gc content pct 45.9 measured
mean read length 36 measured
mean base quality 28.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 22.77 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 42/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 73 measured ×1 15%
mean base quality 28.5 measured ×0.6 8%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 22.77 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 82