Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens amplicon sequencing via 454 GS FLX generates 174K reads with high quality (96.3% ≥Q20, 88% ≥Q30), enabling targeted variant profiling of specific genomic loci or gene panels. Small read count limits population-level inference; well-suited for focused clinical genotyping, deep resequencing validation, or technical-feasibility studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0