Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human bulk RNA sequencing with mixed quality indicators. Moderate QC (83/100, B) with excellent Q30 of 93.2% but catastrophic duplication at 93.33%, which strongly indicates over-amplification and will systematically bias expression estimates away from lowly-expressed genes. Usable for abundant-transcript analysis but unreliable for genome-wide expression studies.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0