Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP031775

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Locusta migratoria
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
4 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 26430757878 reported
total reads 269701611 reported
n content pct 0.003 measured
pct q20 bases 98.2 measured
pct q30 bases 95 measured
gc content pct 35.2 measured
mean read length 49 measured
mean base quality 36.7 measured
adapter content pct 2.23 measured
duplication rate pct 39.66 measured
How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95 measured ×1 100%
QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 60