Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP032833

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Large-scale human bulk-RNA-seq on Genome Analyzer IIx with 1.78 billion 100 bp reads (355 Gb) at 97.3% Q20 and 94.5% Q30 reflects high-quality early next-generation sequencing. The 49.5% GC and good base quality enable comprehensive transcript profiling for understanding human gene expression across tissues and developmental stages.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
18 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 355957484400 reported
total reads 1779787422 reported
n content pct 0.021 measured
pct q20 bases 97.3 measured
pct q30 bases 94.5 measured
gc content pct 49.5 measured
mean read length 100 measured
mean base quality 36.4 measured
adapter content pct 38.59 measured
duplication rate pct 15.89 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.5 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.4 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 38.59 measured ×0.4 0%
duplication rate pct 15.89 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 82