SRP037781

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

85/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Triticum aestivum wheat whole-genome. Solid B-grade data: Q30 84.3% (72/100 score, weight 1, measured) with minimal duplication 0.93%, excellent base quality 33.3. Suitable for variant calling and assembly-guided studies without critical caveats.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Triticum aestivum

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 157203587400 reported

total reads 524011958 reported

n content pct 0.163 measured

pct q20 bases 92.4 measured

pct q30 bases 84.3 measured

gc content pct 43.7 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 33.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.09 measured

duplication rate pct 0.93 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 85/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.3 measured ×1 72%

duplication rate pct 0.93 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.09 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 46 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0