SRP041579

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Dog whole-exome sequencing with clean short reads. Excellent QC (99/100, A) with Q30 of 89.6%, minimal adapter content (0.02%), and low duplication (1.71%); the Q30 metric is the primary quality gate for variant calling confidence, and these values ensure high SNP discovery accuracy. Recommended for reuse in variant and association studies.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Canis lupus familiaris

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

20 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 406735069000 reported

total reads 2033675345 reported

n content pct 0.051 measured

pct q20 bases 94.3 measured

pct q30 bases 89.6 measured

gc content pct 45.1 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 35.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.02 measured

duplication rate pct 1.71 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.6 measured ×1 98%

duplication rate pct 1.71 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 38 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0