Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bacillus subtilis bulk RNA-seq (HiSeq 2500); grade B—usable with duplication awareness. High duplication (62.75%) reflects either aggressive PCR amplification or abundant transcripts; this inflates variance estimates and will obscure weak differential expression signals. High Q30 (98.2%) and mean quality (38.7) support transcript abundance quantification despite the duplication issue.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0