SRP042296

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Oryctolagus cuniculus

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

5 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 358645224 reported

total reads 713098 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.4 measured

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured

gc content pct 54.4 measured

mean read length 97.5 measured

mean base quality 37.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured ×1 99%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0