← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
freshwater sediment metagenome
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
249 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2978009370
reported
total reads
5956058
reported
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
97
measured
pct q30 bases
89.7
measured
gc content pct
54.3
measured
mean read length
456
measured
mean base quality
37
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
77.35
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 99/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.7
measured
×1
99%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
2 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0