Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
80/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human hybrid (short+long) whole-genome sequencing with severe adapter contamination and low evidence strength. Moderate QC (80/100, B) but with critical concerns: adapter content of 25.32% indicates substantial contamination, and evidence_strength of 0.61 means that key metrics are extrapolated rather than directly measured; the adapter contamination will substantially reduce SNP calling accuracy. A deep measured QC pass is needed before reuse.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0