SRP053350

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

79/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

6 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 18072870000 reported

total reads 90364350 reported

n content pct 0.135 measured

pct q20 bases 94.1 measured

pct q30 bases 90.9 measured

gc content pct 52.9 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 62.78 measured

duplication rate pct 42.04 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 79/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 35 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 62.78 measured ×0.4 0%

duplication rate pct 42.04 measured ×0.4 73%

QC cost 15 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0