← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
21/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
human metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
312 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1199857933419
reported
total reads
5940331010
reported
n content pct
42.007
measured
pct q20 bases
56.1
measured
pct q30 bases
53
measured
gc content pct
30.6
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
20.6
measured
adapter content pct
1.05
measured
duplication rate pct
48.86
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 21/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
53
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
48.86
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
1.05
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
18 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0