Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRP058237

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Short-read RNA-seq of human tissues via Illumina HiSeq 2000 producing 51 bp reads with high quality metrics (97.2% Q20). Enables gene expression profiling and transcript abundance estimation, though relatively short read length limits novel isoform discovery and precise splice-junction resolution.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
17 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 52230500409 reported
total reads 780983878 reported
n content pct 0.01 measured
pct q20 bases 97.2 measured
pct q30 bases 94.4 measured
gc content pct 50.1 measured
mean read length 51 measured
mean base quality 37.2 measured
adapter content pct 0.07 measured
duplication rate pct 26.73 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.4 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 37.2 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.07 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 26.73 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 82