SRP058333

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Sedum alfredii

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

11 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 24677949124 reported

total reads 247258280 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 98.2 measured

pct q30 bases 94.1 measured

gc content pct 53.8 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 36.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 56.05 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.1 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.9 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 56.05 measured ×0.4 42%

QC cost 22 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0