SRP058372

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Excellent amplicon dataset ready for reuse; strong Q30 performance (88.4%) and perfect adapter removal with long-read benefit (465.2 bp average) support deep taxonomic profiling despite expected PCR-driven duplication (96.67%).

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

human oral metagenome

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 335536398 reported

total reads 612922 reported

n content pct 0.01 measured

pct q20 bases 96.6 measured

pct q30 bases 88.4 measured

gc content pct 52.1 measured

mean read length 465.2 measured

mean base quality 36.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 96.67 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 88.4 measured ×1 92%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 43 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0