← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
43/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Macrostomum lignano
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
24 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
5.78
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
321346792032
reported
total reads
1272987194
reported
n content pct
0
measured
sampled bases
60337241
measured
sampled reads
10650
measured
gc content pct
46.8
measured
polyg tail pct
0.04
measured
read length sd
4452.4
measured
quality dropoff
0.8
measured
read length max
27693
measured
read length min
50
measured
read length n50
8442
measured
max base quality
14
measured
mean read length
5665.5
measured
max n pct per pos
0
measured
mean base quality
9
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0.55
measured
read length median
4645
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
9
measured
duplication rate pct
0
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.01
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 43/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
read length n50
8442
measured
×1
32%
mean base quality
9
measured
×0.8
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
27 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0