SRP062234

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

71/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WGS dataset marginal for reuse with low evidence strength (0.61); extrapolated coverage of 25.8× may be insufficient for variant calling, and measured duplication at 35.63% suggests sequence artifacts; a complete measured validation pass is needed.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

5 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 79864922204 reported

total reads 395370902 reported

mean coverage 25.8 extrapolated

n content pct 0.009 measured

pct q20 bases 95.7 measured

pct q30 bases 85.3 measured

gc content pct 51.4 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 31.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 35.63 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 71/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 25.8 extrapolated ×1.2 81%

pct q30 bases 85.3 measured ×1 77%

duplication rate pct 35.63 measured ×0.5 14%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 40 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0