← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
37/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Sarcophilus harrisii
Instrument
454 GS FLX+
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
56 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
721781870
reported
total reads
1387123
reported
n content pct
0.031
measured
pct q20 bases
91.3
measured
pct q30 bases
76
measured
gc content pct
51.6
measured
mean read length
501.8
measured
mean base quality
34
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
93.86
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 37/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
76
measured
×1
30%
duplication rate pct
93.86
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
4 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0