SRP064210

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

971 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 198792357768 reported

total reads 2638316733 reported

mean coverage 64.1 extrapolated

n content pct 0.114 measured

pct q20 bases 92.6 measured

pct q30 bases 86.8 measured

gc content pct 41.1 measured

mean read length 76 measured

mean base quality 34.7 measured

adapter content pct 0.04 measured

duplication rate pct 6.31 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 64.1 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 86.8 measured ×1 84%

duplication rate pct 6.31 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.04 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 22 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0