SRP065827

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

98/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

bovine metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 48322201800 reported

total reads 241611009 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 95 measured

pct q30 bases 88.9 measured

gc content pct 50.3 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 34.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.04 measured

duplication rate pct 10.75 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 98/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 88.9 measured ×1 95%

mean base quality 34.9 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.04 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 10.75 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0