← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
NextSeq 500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
12 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
113108623650
reported
total reads
754057491
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
98
measured
pct q30 bases
97.2
measured
gc content pct
48
measured
mean read length
75
measured
mean base quality
35.1
measured
adapter content pct
19.55
measured
duplication rate pct
23.82
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 84/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
97.2
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
35.1
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
19.55
measured
×0.4
3%
duplication rate pct
23.82
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
19 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0