SRP066629

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

4 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 26980246352 reported

total reads 133565576 reported

n content pct 0.012 measured

pct q20 bases 96.6 measured

pct q30 bases 93 measured

gc content pct 45.7 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.2 measured

adapter content pct 0.06 measured

duplication rate pct 11.61 measured

mean target coverage 435.2 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 435.2 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 93 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 11.61 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.06 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0