SRP067104

ENA first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

85/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Yeast WGS with solid measured base quality (Q30=91.9%) but catastrophically high duplication at 37.86%; evidence strength is low (0.61) because coverage is extrapolated rather than measured. Duplication indicates amplification bias; coverage requires independent verification.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3714462300 reported

total reads 12381541 reported

mean coverage 309.5 extrapolated

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 96.6 measured

pct q30 bases 91.9 measured

gc content pct 38.4 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 38.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.13 measured

duplication rate pct 37.86 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 85/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 309.5 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 91.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 37.86 measured ×0.5 7%

adapter content pct 0.13 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0