SRP067131

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WGS dataset of marginal utility due to extreme duplication; although Q20/Q30 and adapter content appear perfect, the severe duplication rate (54.38%) indicates substantial sequence artifacts that will bias variant calling.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Peromyscus leucopus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

191 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 71373596928 reported

total reads 371737484 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 100 measured

pct q30 bases 100 measured

gc content pct 46.5 measured

mean read length 96 measured

mean base quality 30 measured

adapter content pct 0.09 measured

duplication rate pct 54.38 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 54.38 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 0.09 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 39 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0