SRP068722
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from NextSeq 500, human. Grade C (71/100)—assessment is provisional with low evidence_strength; metrics mix reported and measured data, requiring deeper measured validation. Per-base quality (Q30=81.6%, mean_Q=31.5) is the primary grade-limiting metric, directly impacting expression quantification accuracy and reliability for downstream variant-aware analyses. Duplication rate (31.85%) compounds concerns; reuse should await comprehensive measured QC reassessment.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.