SRP069807

ENA first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Colletotrichum hybrid (short+long) genome sequencing with catastrophic base quality. Failed QC (47/100, F) with zero Q30 bases and mean base quality of 7.4, indicating either a long-read format without standard Q-scoring or severe data corruption; no variant or assembly work can proceed until raw data integrity is verified. Not usable in current form.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Colletotrichum higginsianum IMI 349063

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 1500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

hybrid (short+long)

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

28 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 23922426338 reported

total reads 48816222 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 0 measured

pct q30 bases 0 measured

gc content pct 48.9 measured

mean read length 3268.7 measured

mean base quality 7.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 0.01 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 0 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.01 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 39 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0