SRP072219

ENA first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

human lung metagenome

Instrument

454 GS

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

121 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1789846098 reported

total reads 3571066 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 90.1 measured

pct q30 bases 85 measured

gc content pct 51.9 measured

mean read length 251 measured

mean base quality 34.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 95.89 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 85 measured ×1 75%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0