SRP073668

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

WES dataset provisionally suitable for reuse pending full measured validation; measured metrics are excellent (Q30=93.8%, duplication=4.75%, adapter=1.76%), and extrapolated target coverage (1400.9×) is exceptional, but evidence strength is low (0.61).

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 86858448109 reported

total reads 659756908 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 98 measured

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured

gc content pct 48 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.5 measured

adapter content pct 1.76 measured

duplication rate pct 4.75 measured

mean target coverage 1400.9 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 1400.9 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 4.75 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 1.76 measured ×0.4 95%

QC cost 41 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0