← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Helicos HeliScope
Platform
HELICOS
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
9.6
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
259678400
reported
total reads
8248065
reported
n content pct
0
measured
sampled bases
31646228
measured
sampled reads
1000000
measured
gc content pct
30.2
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
5.4
measured
quality dropoff
0
measured
read length max
57
measured
read length min
25
measured
read length n50
32
measured
max base quality
13
measured
mean read length
31.6
measured
max n pct per pos
0
measured
mean base quality
13
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
100
measured
read length median
31
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
median read quality
13
measured
duplication rate pct
14.66
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.11
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 57/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean base quality
13
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
14.66
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
47 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0