← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
0/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
398 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
49858904664
reported
total reads
86036482
reported
n content pct
7.148
measured
pct q20 bases
77.4
measured
pct q30 bases
68.4
measured
gc content pct
47.8
measured
mean read length
251
measured
mean base quality
30.7
measured
adapter content pct
16.95
measured
duplication rate pct
86.6
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 0/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
68.4
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
16.95
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
17 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0