SRP097884

ENA first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Excellent amplicon dataset ready for immediate use; perfect quality metrics (Q30=98.2%, mean quality=37.4%, adapter=0%) combined with high but expected duplication (96.85%) and high coverage (490.9×, extrapolated) support sensitive detection.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Danio rerio

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

485 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 14727926284 reported

total reads 93151761 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 99.5 measured

pct q30 bases 98.2 measured

gc content pct 39.5 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 37.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 96.85 measured

mean target coverage 490.9 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 98.2 measured ×1 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 2 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0