SRP098828

ENA first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

HiSeq 2000 whole-exome capture sequencing of human samples with high quality (97.7% Q20) across ~183 million reads, designed for human variant discovery in exonic regions and clinical genetic diagnosis.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

5 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 28188934696 reported

total reads 183095681 reported

n content pct 0.02 measured

pct q20 bases 97.7 measured

pct q30 bases 94.5 measured

gc content pct 48.3 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 36.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.32 measured

duplication rate pct 0.38 measured

mean target coverage 454.7 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 454.7 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 94.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.38 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.32 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0