← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Enterobacter asburiae
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
104 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
36958878750
reported
total reads
147835515
reported
n content pct
0.802
measured
pct q20 bases
90.2
measured
pct q30 bases
80.7
measured
gc content pct
53.8
measured
mean read length
125
measured
mean base quality
33.6
measured
adapter content pct
0.07
measured
duplication rate pct
3.28
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 76/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
80.7
measured
×1
54%
duplication rate pct
3.28
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0.07
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
13 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0